When the Process Becomes the Conflict: Why Parenting Coordinators Must Sometimes Stop Answering Process Questions

One of the most important lessons I have learned after many years of parenting coordination is that the most difficult disputes are often not about parenting time, decision-making, schooling, activities, exchanges, or communication. Those issues may be the topics that bring parents into the process, but they are not always the issues that consume the most time. In many high-conflict files, the real challenge becomes managing the process itself. Parents can become so focused on discussing how the Parenting Coordinator should operate that they stop using the process to solve the parenting problem that brought them there in the first place. 

This is not a criticism of parents. High-conflict separation often leaves people feeling anxious, uncertain, and distrustful. It is understandable that parents want to know how decisions will be made, how the Parenting Coordinator's authority operates, how fees are charged, and what procedures will apply. Those questions are legitimate. The difficulty arises when a process question has been answered, the answer has been explained, resources have been provided, and the same issue continues to return in slightly different forms. At that point, the discussion often stops advancing the interests of the child and starts consuming resources that were intended to help the child. 

Process Questions Are Important

I encourage parents to learn about the parenting coordination process. In fact, one of the most effective ways to reduce conflict and save money is to understand the structure governing the process from the outset. Parents who understand the Parenting Coordinator's role, authority, limitations, and procedures are often able to navigate disputes more effectively and avoid misunderstandings that can create unnecessary conflict. 

For that reason, I have invested hundreds of hours into extensive written resources made available to the public for free. General information about parenting coordination, conflict management, communication, family dispute resolution, and related topics can be found at https://kelownalawyer.com/resource-library. More detailed information organized by parenting coordination subject matter can be found at https://parentingcoordinatorbc.online/resource-library. Questions concerning the Parenting Coordinator's authority, jurisdiction, procedures, billing practices, participation agreement, and governing contractual framework are addressed in detail at https://parentingcoordinatorbc.online/roster-contract-explained. 

These resources exist because many process questions arise repeatedly from file to file. Rather than requiring every parent to pay for individualized explanations of the same issues, comprehensive answers have already been prepared and made available. Parents are encouraged to review these materials carefully before raising process concerns that have already been addressed in writing. 

The Pattern That Sometimes Develops

Most Parenting Coordinators eventually observe a recurring pattern in certain files. A parent asks a process question. The question is answered. The answer is explained. The parent is directed to the appropriate agreement, webpage, or resource. The issue appears to be resolved. 

A short time later, the same concern returns. It may be framed slightly differently. A hypothetical example may be introduced. A variation of the question may be asked. A concern that was already addressed may be revisited from another angle. The discussion gradually shifts away from the parenting issue requiring implementation and toward the process itself. 

Eventually, something remarkable occurs. The file may contain extensive correspondence, significant professional time, and substantial expense, yet little progress has been made on the actual parenting issue. The parents are no longer using the process. They are debating the process. What began as a dispute about parenting has become a dispute about parenting coordination. 

Why Repetition Creates Cost Without Creating Solutions

Every communication directed to a Parenting Coordinator requires professional attention. Emails must be reviewed. Questions must be considered. Responses must be drafted. Communications must be documented. Decisions must be made about whether a response is necessary and whether the issue falls within the Parenting Coordinator's jurisdiction. 

As a result, repeated discussions about matters that have already been addressed can generate significant expense without producing any corresponding benefit for the child. The parties may be paying for time spent revisiting the same process issues rather than resolving the parenting issues that originally required intervention. The Parenting Coordinator is working, but the work is not advancing implementation. The result is that retainers diminish while the underlying conflict remains unresolved. 

This is one reason why process management is such an important aspect of parenting coordination. Left unchecked, repetitive process discussions can consume the resources that were intended to assist families. What appears to be a simple question can lead to multiple rounds of correspondence, further clarification requests, additional explanations, and ongoing debate. The cumulative effect can be substantial. 

This Is Not About Determining Motives

When a Parenting Coordinator limits further discussion of a process issue, it is important not to assume that this reflects a finding that a parent has acted improperly. In most cases, the Parenting Coordinator does not need to determine why a question is being asked repeatedly. Some parents are genuinely anxious. Some need reassurance. Some are struggling to trust the process because of previous litigation experiences. Others may sincerely believe that additional explanation will eventually provide the certainty they are seeking. 

In some cases, process discussions may also be used strategically. A parent may not consciously view their behaviour this way, but repeated challenges to the process can delay implementation, consume resources, create leverage, and shift attention away from the substantive parenting issue. From a process perspective, however, the Parenting Coordinator often does not need to decide which explanation is correct. The practical question is much simpler: Is the communication helping implement parenting arrangements, or is it merely creating additional discussion about matters that have already been addressed? The answer to that question determines how the process should be managed. 

Why Some Process Questions May Receive No Further Response

One of the most misunderstood aspects of parenting coordination is the belief that every communication requires a substantive response. In reality, effective process management sometimes requires the opposite approach. Once a process question has been asked, answered, explained, and supported with references to the governing agreement and available resources, there may be little value in continuing the discussion. 

At that point, the answer already exists. The participation agreement has not changed. The Parenting Coordinator's authority has not changed. The applicable procedures have not changed. The parent has been directed to the relevant materials, including the kelownalawyer.com Resource Library, Parenting Coordinator BC Resource Library, and Roster Contract Explained. 

When a vague or repetitive process question concerns a matter that has already been addressed, no further substantive response may be provided. The communication may still be reviewed. It may still be noted in the file. It may still be factually recorded in reports and accounts. However, additional correspondence is not generated simply because the same process issue has been raised again. 

This is not a punishment. It is not a finding of bad faith. It is not an attempt to silence a parent. It is a structural boundary designed to prevent the parenting coordination process from becoming an expensive and endless discussion about itself. 

Structure Protects Children, Parents, and the Process

One of the most important insights I have gained from years of parenting coordination is that children benefit when the process remains focused on implementation. They do not benefit when professional resources are consumed by repetitive debates about procedure. Parents may understandably wish for certainty and reassurance, but certainty ultimately comes from understanding and using the structure rather than continually questioning it. 

The most successful files are rarely the files where parents agree about everything. They are usually the files where parents eventually accept the structure of the process. They use it. They move through it. They focus their energy on resolving parenting issues rather than negotiating how the Parenting Coordinator operates. 

Parenting coordination is ultimately intended to help children experience stability, consistency, and forward movement. The process can only achieve those goals if it remains focused on implementation. Answering a process question once is often helpful. Answering it repeatedly may simply generate fees without generating solutions. For that reason, one of the most effective ways to preserve resources and keep the focus on children is surprisingly simple: provide the answer, identify the relevant resource, direct the parent to the governing materials, and then continue the work of helping the family move forward.

Read next "How Parenting Coordination Works in My Practice: Implementation, Proportionality, and Process Management". Written by Cori L. McGuire, family law mediator, arbitrator, collaborative family law lawyer and Parenting Coordinator with a family law practice in British Columbia since 1998. 

© 2026 Cori McGuire. All Rights Reserved. Proprietary Workflow.

↩ To return to the original webpage, use your browser's Back button or back arrow.